About Neom Aquellum?

Engaging with nature has been a central tenet of architectural practice throughout history. While the presented project is intriguing, it prompts questions and uncertainties that merit exploration in alignment with human nature and architectural principles. Before delving into philosophical considerations, the architect should address practical and aesthetic aspects related to functions, programs, circulation, transportation, and the destination’s intrinsic value. Here are key points for reflection:

  1. Choice of Underground Location: The decision to place the structure underground in this area raises questions about contextual background and potential disconnection from the surroundings. Utilizing the existing valley could enhance coherence with the environment.
  2. Limitations of Underground Spaces: Humans seek interaction with expansive spaces, especially in natural settings. The underground concept contradicts this inclination, as people generally yearn for connections with limitless surroundings to enhance sensory experiences and mental well-being.
  3. Practicality of Excavation: The artificially created excavation and steep slope pose practical challenges. Awareness of the dangers and uncertainties associated with cutting the mountain steeply is crucial. The design should incorporate potential variations in nature’s response during excavation.
  4. Upside-Down Skyscraper Concept: While visually striking, the upside-down skyscraper lacks uniqueness due to previous introductions in movies and competitions. The absence of a clear rationale diminishes its significance.
  5. Impact of Sunlight Deprivation: Concerns about daylight deprivation during the daytime raise questions about the building potentially causing a sense of depression. Sunlight’s importance for energy and rejuvenation should not be underestimated in architectural design.
  6. Financial Viability: Heavy reliance on excavated areas suggests high construction costs. Limited external views and internal spaces resembling a dungeon may challenge attracting guests for extended stays. Room occupancy rates and overall return on investment need careful evaluation.
  7. Structural Stability & Safety: The ambitious excavation may pose challenges to structural stability. The practicality and safety of accessing an underground structure of this magnitude, especially in emergencies, require thorough examination.
  8. Brutalistic Architecture: Aesthetically, the design appears excessively harsh. Brutalist architecture, known for its stark appearance, had a brief historical presence due to a lack of resonance with the majority’s aesthetic preferences. The architect may benefit from a deeper understanding of historical tastes.

In summary, the design, while intriguing, faces challenges in practicality and aesthetic appeal. Emphasizing exploration and capturing the beauty of natural surroundings through architectural elements would be more effective than excessive excavation. The goal should be a design that transcends competition entries, conveying a genuine message about highlighting the region’s magnificence.

Post Date Jan. 19, 2024

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *